Wrike vs Asana | Project Management Software Comparison

See how the robust project management tools Wrike and Asana compare.

When it comes to selecting project management software, teams have a wide variety of options, including Wrike and Asana. Both tools are great for managing tasks and projects; however, there are minor differences in the approach and features of each project management solution.

We’ll compare and contrast Wrike and Asana based on features that each of the best project management platforms should have built in. For this comparison, we look at the enterprise versions of both Wrike and Asana.

SEE: Hiring kit: Project manager (Tech Republic Premium)

What is Wrike?

Wrike is a popular project and work management tool from Citrix. The Wrike platform is highly customizable and offers everything from custom workflows to custom dashboards. Other key Wrike features include real-time project management, end-to-end visibility for all projects and tasks, as well as robust security elements.

What is Asana?

asana is a cloud-based tool for easy task and project management. Asana is known for its ability to enable teams to easily track all aspects of a project, collaborate in real time, and manage their resources.

Head-to-head comparison: Wrike vs. asana

Task management

Wrike and Asana are excellent tools for managing project tasks, and they are similar in their approach. For example, both Wrike and Asana allow teams to add tasks, sort tasks by due date, attach files to tasks, and set deadlines. Each tool allows teams to add subtasks to subtasks, making splitting work easy.

Both Wrike and Asana allow teams to view tasks in the way they see fit. Asana offers several views including list view and boards. Wrike offers views such as Table View, Gantt Chart, and Stream View.

One key difference lies in the time tracking capabilities, which are important when managing tasks and resources. Wrike has a built-in time tracking tool. Asana doesn’t have time tracking so you have to use a 3rd party integration

Team collaboration

When it comes to managing projects, team collaboration matters. Fortunately, Wrike and Asana are both built for simplified collaboration. Wrike and Asana allow teams to comment on tasks, upload attachments for context, and create shared team calendars. In addition, these two project management tools provide more robust collaboration tools such as proofing, keeping feedback streamlined.

There are differences between the collaboration features of these tools. For example, Wrike allows teams to simultaneously edit job descriptions through the live editor. Asana does not support this feature.

customization

No two organizations manage projects exactly the same, which is why customization is critical when selecting project management software. Wrike and Asana offer many customizations that teams can use to personalize their workspaces.

For example, both project management tools allow teams to build custom workflows. In Asana, teams can use the Workflow Builder, a visual tool to create automated work processes. In Wrike, teams can use the Automation Engine to do the same.

Integrations

Wrike and Asana offer a huge library of integrations for teams to choose from. Popular integrations for Wrike include Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Gmail, Jira, and Slack. Popular integrations for Asana include all of these options, as well as Adobe Creative Cloud, Tableau, Clockwise, and Zapier.

Wrike vs. Asana: Comparison of Functions

Prices

There is only a small price difference between Asana Business and Wrike Business. For Asana, teams can expect to pay $24.99/month per user per month; for Wrike, teams can expect to pay $24.80 per month per user.

Wrike vs. Asana: Which Project Management Software Should You Choose?

For teams that value a robust project management tool that still prioritizes simplicity, Asana could be a good choice. For teams experienced in using project management software and requiring more complex built-in tools such as time tracking, Wrike may be the better option.